"The finished product will blow out tires, huge gaps and holes left in the pavement. DO NOT USE THEM. They destroyed access to our homes and don't provide steal plates to access our drive ways. Never finished the roads/curbs they started fixing so they expect people to park streets away from their homes they pay property taxes for. No response from Jason Hall the supervisor when contacted about the terrible way the roads and curbs are left. Funded by the city so taxpayers. Terrible service. Only see workers about 2 hours a day and they bill from 7am-5pm as posted by them."
Constructor acts very similarly to a method returning the constructed type. And async method can't return just any type, it has to be either “fire and forget” void, or Task. If the constructor of type T actually returned Task<T>, that would be very confusing, I think. If the async constructor behaved the same way as an async void method, that kind of breaks what constructor is meant to be ...
Summary: I would like to call an asynchronous method in a constructor. Is this possible? Details: I have a method called getwritings() that parses JSON data. Everything works fine if I just call
An abstract class constructor c# code example will be explained. But, the next question can also be arises, as if we cannot instantiate (construct an object using new) an abstract class, then what for a constructor is in an abstract class or why should we use a constructor in abstract class?
If you need to call the base constructor in the middle of the override, then extract it to an actual method on the base class that you can call explicitly. The assumption with base constructors is that they're absolutely necessary to safely create an object, so the base will be called first, always.
Without "Constructor Chain", you must repeat initializaion code in all constractors of class. in above example, method "a" will be executed first, and then instruction sequence will return to method "b".
Please guide me is among best practices to use constructor with for list initialization? How to assign values to list using a constructor, so if no value passed a default will be used?
You might be thinking of the "object initializer" in C#, where you can construct an object by setting the properties of the class, rather than using a parameterized constructor.
The constructor needs to have the same generic specification as the class itself. Otherwise it would be impossible to know if the int in your example would relate to the class or to the constructor.
Select the most specific private constructor so you can have multiple overloads, still without having to use attributes. Select the constructor marked with an attribute of a specific name - like the default resolver, but without a dependency on the Json.Net package because you need to reference Newtonsoft.Json.JsonConstructorAttribute.
Having the following service constructor public class Service : IService { public Service(IOtherService service1, IAnotherOne service2, string arg) { } } What are the choices of